← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew McGroarty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brunswick NE-Prep 24 5 7 12 0.500 0.1411 0.1411 0.2288 0.2288
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 12 14 26 0.867 0.2445 0.2445 0.3966 0.3966
2020-21 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.1108 0.1108 0.5319 0.5319
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 62 9 10 19 0.306 0.1884 0.1864 0.9030 0.8936
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 62 14 12 26 0.419 0.2578 0.2417 1.2356 1.1584
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 37 3 3 6 0.162
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 20 0 2 2 0.100
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 22 1 5 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Quinnipiac
+45.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23404
Forward overall
#1272
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.