IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Coutre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 8 1 3 4 0.500 0.1946 0.2191 0.7291 0.8208
2015-16 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 29 0 1 1 0.035 0.0134 0.0144 0.0503 0.0539
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Northland D3 — SO 9 3 0 3 0.333
2019-20 Northland D3 — FR 23 4 4 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Northland
+322.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#63344
Forward overall
#3303
Forward born in 1998
#3953
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Wahl
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Luhmann
Endicott · 2014-15
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sheldon Brett
Bryn Athyn · 2013-14
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.