← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sheldon Brett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.1401 0.1508 0.5250 0.5652
2014-15 BCHL 21 4 2 6 0.286 0.1112 0.1145 0.4166 0.4290
2015-16 Powell River Kings BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Finlandia D3 JR 8 2 3 5 0.625
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 SO 25 4 10 14 0.560
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 FR 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2018-19 · Bryn Athyn
+35.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32888
Forward overall
#1456
Forward born in 1996
#2721
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.