IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew McDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 54 13 14 27 0.500 0.1857 0.1923 0.5294 0.5481
2013-14 Fargo Force USHL 53 4 6 10 0.189 0.1202 0.1142 0.5655 0.5371
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bentley D1 AHA SR 37 2 6 8 0.216
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA JR 39 4 8 12 0.308
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA SO 21 4 2 6 0.286
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA FR 32 5 11 16 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2014-15 · Bentley
+301.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28165
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Moher
Amherst · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nauman
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.