IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 14 1 4 5 0.357 0.0998 0.1056 0.2464 0.2606
2011-12 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 23 5 8 13 0.565 0.1579 0.1601 0.3900 0.3953
2012-13 Niagara IceDogs OHL 53 4 6 10 0.189 0.1126 0.1067 0.4888 0.4634
2013-14 Niagara IceDogs OHL 19 1 4 5 0.263 0.1571 0.1409 0.6817 0.6113
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 0 225 2038 2263 0.000
2019-20 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 0 156 1527 1683 0.000
2018-19 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 0 88 923 1011 0.000
2017-18 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 0 12 101 113 0.000
2003-04 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 33 1 6 7 0.212
2002-03 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 34 3 5 8 0.235

NCAAe Rankings

#24686
Forward overall
#953
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Watson
Utica · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.