IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Nauman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Janesville Jets NAHL 39 13 11 24 0.615 0.2285 0.2366 0.6516 0.6747
2010-11 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 23 39 62 1.069 0.3969 0.3907 1.1319 1.1143
2011-12 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 60 20 24 44 0.733 0.2723 0.2547 0.7764 0.7261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 23 5 6 11 0.478
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 27 20 13 33 1.222
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 24 6 6 12 0.500
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 6 1 2 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+89.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10300
Forward overall
#402
Forward born in 1991
#456
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Leimbrock
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.