IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Soo Eagles NOJHL 48 22 45 67 1.396 0.2353 0.2313 0.5800 0.5701
2010-11 Soo Eagles NOJHL 50 28 39 67 1.340 0.2259 0.2101 0.5568 0.5178
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA FR 26 1 13 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2011-12 · Marian
+187.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16700
Forward overall
#697
Forward born in 1990
#56
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Yates
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Hammond
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.