IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Vince Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 16 0 3 3 0.188 0.0460 0.0484 0.1291 0.1360
2007-08 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 45 5 6 11 0.244 0.0599 0.0604 0.1683 0.1696
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 47 5 13 18 0.383 0.0939 0.0898 0.2637 0.2523
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 55 6 34 40 0.727 0.1783 0.1612 0.5007 0.4527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 12 1 5 6 0.500
2010-11 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 7 10 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2010-11 · SUNY Morrisville
+465.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10571
Defenseman overall
#1199
Defenseman born in 1989
#2177
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braeden Kennedy
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matteo Viglino
New England College · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.