← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Leimbrock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Brampton Capitals OJHL 46 6 12 18 0.391 0.0959 0.1045 0.2694 0.2934
2005-06 Brampton Capitals OJHL 47 8 20 28 0.596 0.1460 0.1537 0.4101 0.4316
2006-07 Brampton Capitals OJHL 49 16 20 36 0.735 0.1801 0.1805 0.5058 0.5070
2007-08 Brampton Capitals OJHL 42 21 18 39 0.929 0.2276 0.2178 0.6393 0.6119
2008-09 OJHL 52 29 44 73 1.404 0.3441 0.3117 0.9665 0.8755
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 30 12 8 20 0.667
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 30 12 13 25 0.833
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 23 4 6 10 0.435
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 29 9 6 15 0.517
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+120.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13575
Forward overall
#530
Forward born in 1988
#375
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.