IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Moher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Peterborough Bees OJHL 44 10 21 31 0.705 0.1968 0.2118 0.4862 0.5234
2002-03 Soo Greyhounds OHL 17 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Ottawa 67's OHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.2558 0.2556 1.1102 1.1094
2004-05 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 28 30 58 1.074 0.3065 0.2929 0.8315 0.7946
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Amherst D3 — SR 25 8 16 24 0.960
2011-12 Amherst D3 — JR 29 13 16 29 1.000
2010-11 Amherst D3 — SO 25 4 10 14 0.560
2009-10 Amherst D3 — FR 22 3 8 11 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2009-10 · Amherst
+110.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16511
Forward overall
#625
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Sternbach
Hobart · 2015-16
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Ouellette
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Roubos
Lawrence · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.