IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Marini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack USPHL-Premier 41 19 25 44 1.073 0.1445 0.1491 0.3653 0.3769
2018-19 Connecticut Nighthawks USPHL-Premier 44 29 45 74 1.682 0.2264 0.2216 0.5725 0.5603
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 22 34 56 1.217 0.2613 0.2613 0.5962 0.5962
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC GR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2023-24 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 18 6 12 18 1.000
2022-23 Southern Maine D3 NEHC JR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2021-22 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 23 8 8 16 0.696
2020-21 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17395
Forward overall
#650
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.