IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Stroud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 48 9 16 25 0.521 0.1913 0.1890 0.5497 0.5430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Western New England D3 CNE SR 24 7 13 20 0.833
2013-14 Western New England D3 CNE JR 24 8 10 18 0.750
2012-13 Western New England D3 CNE SO 25 15 17 32 1.280
2011-12 Western New England D3 CNE FR 26 12 16 28 1.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2011-12 · Western New England
+565.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26920
Forward overall
#989
Forward born in 1990
#2256
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Arcan
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Van Horn
Adrian · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Sisson
Bowdoin · 2006-07
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.