IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Van Horn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 51 11 13 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1878 0.4967 0.5395
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 61 19 17 36 0.590 0.1280 0.1304 0.4566 0.4651
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 37 33 70 1.129 0.2449 0.2376 0.8735 0.8476
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA — 29 8 9 17 0.586
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA — 25 8 4 12 0.480
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 34 3 3 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2016-17 · Colorado College
+5.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19532
Forward overall
#771
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2002-03
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2004-05
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.