IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Wahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 46 1 6 7 0.152 0.0565 0.0611 0.1611 0.1743
2017-18 — NAHL 52 5 13 18 0.346 0.1285 0.1327 0.3666 0.3786
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 10 17 27 0.529 0.1966 0.1942 0.5605 0.5538
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 25 6 3 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2019-20 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+147.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28882
Forward overall
#1249
Forward born in 1999
#3402
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Hilliard
Castleton · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Dusek
Chatham · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.