IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Dusek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 39 9 14 23 0.590 0.0794 0.0819 0.2007 0.2070
2018-19 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 42 18 36 54 1.286 0.1731 0.1693 0.4377 0.4281
2019-20 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 10 48 58 1.318 0.1774 0.1774 0.4487 0.4487
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 18 0 5 5 0.278
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 24 5 8 13 0.542
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 25 1 5 6 0.240
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 7 0 3 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2020-21 · Chatham
+238.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6848
Defenseman overall
#1144
Defenseman born in 1999
#598
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Neville
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vadim Vasjonkin
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke James
Becker · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2016-17
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.