| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | BCHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | — | NTDP-U18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | — | BCHL | 50 | 20 | 25 | 45 | 0.900 | 0.3352 | 0.3624 | 1.3114 | 1.4179 |
| 2022-23 | — | BCHL | 51 | 29 | 39 | 68 | 1.333 | 0.4967 | 0.5127 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 14 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 0.786 | 0.4830 | 0.4638 | 2.3148 | 2.2229 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SO | 35 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.371 |
| 2024-25 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | — | 33 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 0.273 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.