IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Mendel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Penticton Vees BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 2 12 14 0.269 0.1037 0.1156 0.3918 0.4369
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 2 8 10 0.192 0.0741 0.0788 0.2799 0.2978
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 42 5 10 15 0.357
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC SR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2019-20 Denver D1 NCHC JR 36 3 6 9 0.250
2018-19 Denver D1 NCHC SO 41 1 5 6 0.146
2017-18 Denver D1 NCHC FR 33 1 2 3 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2017-18 · Denver
2.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19850
Defenseman overall
#3014
Defenseman born in 1999
#2857
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Gingera
Concordia · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Antenucci
Trine · 2018-19
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Domenic Settimo
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.