IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon McReynolds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 54 27 41 68 1.259 0.2123 0.2014 0.5232 0.4964
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC GR 28 9 8 17 0.607
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 18 3 2 5 0.278
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-49.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18685
Forward overall
#766
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.