← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Rome Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Calgary Canucks AJHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1342 0.1465 0.3701 0.4040
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 56 20 23 43 0.768 0.2959 0.3092 1.1168 1.1672
2017-18 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 55 22 48 70 1.273 0.4904 0.4890 1.8510 1.8456
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 30 9 7 16 0.533
2021-22 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2020-21 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2019-20 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Western Michigan
-70.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9595
Forward overall
#431
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.