← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Percival Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Millbrook NE-Prep 29 6 4 10 0.345 0.0665 0.0665 0.1578 0.1578
2019-20 Millbrook NE-Prep 32 21 27 48 1.500 0.2893 0.2893 0.6864 0.6864
2020-21 Millbrook NE-Prep 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0964 0.0964 0.2288 0.2288
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 15 24 39 0.661 0.3899 0.3670 1.9474 1.8329
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 38 8 8 16 0.421
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 39 9 10 19 0.487
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 36 7 7 14 0.389
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 34 6 6 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · UConn
+59.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12246
Forward overall
#601
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.