IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Doug Lindensmith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 53 16 15 31 0.585 0.1499 0.1582 0.4409 0.4653
2009-10 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 56 28 34 62 1.107 0.2836 0.2863 0.8345 0.8424
2010-11 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 55 33 65 98 1.782 0.4565 0.4380 1.3431 1.2887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 23 14 10 24 1.044
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2011-12 · Norwich
+223.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9527
Forward overall
#397
Forward born in 1990
#24
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.