← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Canucks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 56 4 19 23 0.411 0.1363 0.1363 0.3806 0.3806
2020-21 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 10 2 4 6 0.600 0.1991 0.1991 0.5561 0.5561
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 61 2 26 28 0.459 0.2821 0.2902 1.3523 1.3913
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Denver D1 NCHC SR 43 2 2 4 0.093
2024-25 Denver D1 NCHC 44 1 7 8 0.182
2023-24 Denver D1 NCHC 41 3 4 7 0.171
2022-23 Denver D1 NCHC 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Denver
-66.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5466
Defenseman overall
#1377
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.30 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.