Seth Barton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-08-18 Country: Canada

2018 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #81 ·

Detroit Red Wings

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Nanaimo Clippers	BCHL	2	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2017-18	Trail Smoke Eaters	BCHL	49	6	27	33	0.673	0.2509	0.2611	0.9814	1.0214
2023-24	KooKoo	Liiga	19	3	8	11	0.579	1.4472	1.5952	—	—
2024-25	KooKoo	Liiga	55	6	13	19	0.345	0.8637	0.9218	—	—
2025-26	Malmö Redhawks	SHL	47	4	12	16	0.340	0.8510	0.8510	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2020-21	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	JR	20	2	9	11	0.550
2019-20	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	SO	30	3	12	15	0.500
2018-19	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	FR	33	2	8	10	0.303

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.25

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.30

2018-19 · UMass Lowell

+22.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects

12%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Wiesner

Babson · 2015-16

0.885 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Pat Egan

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13

1.080 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Matt Silcoff

Middlebury · 2011-12

0.960 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.