| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | — | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | — | BCHL | 50 | 13 | 26 | 39 | 0.780 | 0.2906 | 0.3289 | 1.1365 | 1.2862 |
| 2018-19 | — | BCHL | 37 | 11 | 29 | 40 | 1.081 | 0.4027 | 0.4340 | 1.5753 | 1.6979 |
| 2019-20 | — | BCHL | 42 | 19 | 25 | 44 | 1.048 | 0.3902 | 0.3902 | 1.5265 | 1.5265 |
| 2020-21 | — | BCHL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | SR | 30 | 10 | 34 | 44 | 1.467 |
| 2022-23 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | JR | 38 | 17 | 29 | 46 | 1.210 |
| 2021-22 | Denver | D1 | NCHC | SO | 39 | 12 | 24 | 36 | 0.923 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.