IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dovar Tinling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 50 21 30 51 1.020 0.3257 0.3257 0.7896 0.7896
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 39 12 13 25 0.641 0.3940 0.3916 1.8885 1.8770
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 43 17 30 47 1.093 0.4071 0.3925 1.5926 1.5356
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC SR 35 7 9 16 0.457
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC JR 32 10 10 20 0.625
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC SO 34 5 12 17 0.500
2021-22 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 14 1 0 1 0.071
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 12 1 1 2 0.167

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9581
Forward overall
#415
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.