IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex DiPaolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Coquitlam Express BCHL 53 16 32 48 0.906 0.3490 0.3565 1.3181 1.3465
2019-20 — BCHL 56 14 24 38 0.679 0.2615 0.2615 0.9876 0.9876
2020-21 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 13 2 11 13 1.000 0.3853 0.3853 1.4553 1.4553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 32 11 15 26 0.812
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 26 12 11 23 0.885
2022-23 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 40 11 15 26 0.650
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 31 4 9 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2021-22 · Colgate
+37.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13858
Forward overall
#590
Forward born in 2000
#509
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Daigle
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.