← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Poisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 14 16 30 0.517 0.1993 0.2165 0.7527 0.8178
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 49 21 26 47 0.959 0.3696 0.3696 1.3959 1.3959
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Providence D1 HockeyEast GR 37 8 8 16 0.432
2023-24 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 35 9 15 24 0.686
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 37 10 10 20 0.540
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 37 10 25 35 0.946
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 24 5 9 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2020-21 · Providence
+214.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17098
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 2001
#718
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.