IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Reimann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine USHS-MN 28 13 19 32 1.143 0.1447 0.1447 0.2776 0.2776
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 49 10 8 18 0.367 0.1349 0.1349 0.3877 0.3877
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 62 8 12 20 0.323 0.1903 0.1854 0.9689 0.9439
2022-23 — USHL 55 10 12 22 0.400 0.2360 0.2177 1.2014 1.1080
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 35 2 6 8 0.229
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 35 1 3 4 0.114
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
-31.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27086
Forward overall
#1544
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Hovanec
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Burmaster
Utica · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.