← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicolas Ardanaz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Vernon Vipers BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 4 28 32 0.552 0.2055 0.2055 0.8039 0.8039
2020-21 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 20 1 9 10 0.500 0.1862 0.1862 0.7286 0.7286
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 4 31 35 0.660 0.2460 0.2399 0.9623 0.9385
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 31 0 1 1 0.032
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 26 0 3 3 0.115
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC 18 1 2 3 0.167
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · RPI
-33.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5682
Defenseman overall
#1435
Defenseman born in 2002
#1523
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.