← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Fraser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Langley Rivermen BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Langley Rivermen BCHL 56 13 21 34 0.607 0.2339 0.2339 0.8846 0.8846
2020-21 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 20 6 10 16 0.800 0.3082 0.3082 1.1657 1.1657
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 49 20 37 57 1.163 0.4482 0.4250 1.6950 1.6071
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 38 6 8 14 0.368
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 39 4 8 12 0.308
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 35 7 4 11 0.314
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 34 4 5 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · UConn
-27.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12114
Forward overall
#538
Forward born in 2001
#422
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.