IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.J. Fecteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 44 19 32 51 1.159 0.1516 0.1461 0.3934 0.3791
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 1 7 8 0.154 0.0593 0.0593 0.2238 0.2238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC — 12 1 3 4 0.333
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29819
Forward overall
#1564
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sammy Michaud
University of New England · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rasberg
University of New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.