IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sammy Michaud Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 46 5 7 12 0.261 0.0732 0.0760 0.2145 0.2226
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 10 14 24 0.571 0.1604 0.1586 0.4698 0.4645
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE SR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE SR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2016-17 University of New England D3 CNE FR 18 4 8 12 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2016-17 · University of New England
+520.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41806
Forward overall
#1857
Forward born in 1996
#186
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nikolai Tishkevich
Neumann · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.J. Fecteau
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Artem Kondrashov
Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.