IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolai Tishkevich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-09 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 20 23 43 0.768 0.2821 0.2901 0.8105 0.8334
2023-24 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 53 21 16 37 0.698 0.2565 0.2515 0.7368 0.7224
2024-25 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 35 16 12 28 0.800 0.2939 0.2727 0.8444 0.7836
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC FR 27 10 8 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2025-26 · Neumann
+194.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15542
Forward overall
#747
Forward born in 2004
#771
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caden Pendo
Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.