← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayson Arnott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 51 7 20 27 0.529 0.1298 0.1298 0.3645 0.3645
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 20 4 7 11 0.550 0.2119 0.2119 0.8004 0.8004
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 48 6 31 37 0.771 0.2970 0.2754 1.1217 1.0402
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast 20 2 0 2 0.100
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 34 2 9 11 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Maine
+24.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5259
Defenseman overall
#1189
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.