IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Djurasevic Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 21 4 16 20 0.952 0.2687 0.2687 0.4358 0.4358
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 20 4 5 9 0.450 0.1676 0.1676 0.6557 0.6557
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 5 25 30 0.566 0.2108 0.2032 0.8247 0.7950
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 10 36 46 0.852 0.3173 0.2903 1.2413 1.1358
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 34 5 9 14 0.412
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 38 7 21 28 0.737
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 35 4 6 10 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Merrimack
+18.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.