IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zeth Kindrachuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 14 3 6 9 0.643 0.2477 0.2477 0.9368 0.9368
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 36 2 5 7 0.194 0.0749 0.0746 0.2833 0.2823
2022-23 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 55 15 24 39 0.709 0.2378 0.2251 0.6572 0.6221
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 12 4 2 6 0.500
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 23 8 1 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2023-24 · Albertus Magnus
+177.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30569
Forward overall
#1794
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Drevitch
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Clayton Boyd
Neumann · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.