IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Matta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 2 6 8 0.400 0.1490 0.1490 0.5828 0.5828
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 32 7 11 18 0.562 0.2095 0.2080 0.8196 0.8136
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC GR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC SR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC JR 32 1 1 2 0.062
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7643
Defenseman overall
#1796
Defenseman born in 2002
#1917
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Olson
Hobart · 2010-11
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.