← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bongo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 28 10 16 26 0.929 0.2146 0.2146 0.7483 0.7483
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 24 24 48 0.906 0.3490 0.3523 1.3161 1.3285
2022-23 Surrey Eagles BCHL 53 22 34 56 1.057 0.4071 0.3910 1.5353 1.4746
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 37 1 5 6 0.162
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 36 3 7 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Sacred Heart
-13.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9013
Forward overall
#377
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.