IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Mistry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2451 0.2822 0.6885 0.7928
2019-20 Milton Academy NE-Prep 29 0 7 7 0.241 0.0478 0.0478 0.1100 0.1100
2020-21 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 5 22 27 0.509 0.1963 0.1982 0.7413 0.7483
2022-23 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 11 47 58 1.074 0.4139 0.3975 1.5631 1.5013
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC JR 31 0 6 6 0.194
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 32 2 10 12 0.375
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 30 0 11 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2023-24 · Brown
+22.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4310
Defenseman overall
#1061
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.