IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Beneteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 46 10 9 19 0.413 0.1538 0.1599 0.6018 0.6256
2022-23 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 53 20 36 56 1.057 0.3936 0.3899 1.5396 1.5251
2023-24 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 54 17 46 63 1.167 0.4346 0.4106 1.7000 1.6061
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 33 5 4 9 0.273
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 32 2 5 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · St. Lawrence
-36.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11158
Forward overall
#496
Forward born in 2003
#397
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.