IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 45 1 15 16 0.356 0.0872 0.0872 0.2434 0.2434
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 13 1 3 4 0.308 0.0711 0.0711 — —
2021-22 — BCHL 57 4 13 17 0.298 0.1149 0.1183 0.4345 0.4474
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 4 12 16 0.296 0.1142 0.1120 0.4317 0.4233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 12 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 5 0 2 2 0.400
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · UConn
-34.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13486
Defenseman overall
#2640
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2009-10
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Workman
Finlandia · 2010-11
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.