IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Boutoussov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0733 0.2111 0.2105
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 40 25 25 50 1.250 0.2888 0.2780 0.6116 0.5887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Babson D3 LittleEast — 26 12 10 22 0.846
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE JR 20 4 5 9 0.450
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 20 4 5 9 0.450
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE SO 25 20 6 26 1.040
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 25 20 6 26 1.040
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 29 15 6 21 0.724
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+331.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12769
Forward overall
#514
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Kuzyk
Adrian · 2006-07
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Fortin
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.