← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Lammens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 0 1 1 0.036 0.0101 0.0101 0.0163 0.0163
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 53 1 16 17 0.321 0.1195 0.1186 0.4674 0.4639
2022-23 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 24 0 10 10 0.417 0.1552 0.1464 0.6072 0.5729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC GR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 24 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · St. Lawrence
+11.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15353
Defenseman overall
#2812
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.