IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Marsella Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 3 10 13 0.481 0.0954 0.0954 0.2194 0.2194
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0510 0.0510 0.1005 0.1005
2021-22 Powell River Kings BCHL 52 1 14 15 0.288 0.1112 0.1111 0.4199 0.4195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14230
Defenseman overall
#2686
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2013-14
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Oddleifson
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Casale
Salem State · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.