IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Coquitlam Express BCHL 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0308 0.0316 0.1164 0.1193
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 27 1 4 5 0.185 0.0621 0.0605 0.1714 0.1671
2023-24 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 6 8 14 0.259 0.0870 0.0807 0.2400 0.2226
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 1 1 2 0.080
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 21 2 2 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+206.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54416
Forward overall
#3730
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Ledford
Adrian · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Keith Smiliowitz
Post · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
David Hopfer
Canton · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.