IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aram Minnetian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-19 Country: USA
2023 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #125  ·  Dallas Stars Dallas Stars
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NTDP-U18 44 2 12 14 0.318 0.2467 0.2521 1.1843 1.2103
2022-23 — NTDP-U18 62 7 24 31 0.500 0.3877 0.3758 1.8610 1.8039
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast JR 36 2 9 11 0.306
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 35 2 13 15 0.429
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 40 3 6 9 0.225
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Boston College
-26.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Matt Nuttle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.43 No data
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.30 No data
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kennedy
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.