← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Voltin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 USHL 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.2547 0.2797 1.1987 1.3162
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 7 19 26 0.433 0.2759 0.2883 1.2985 1.3567
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 33 3 11 14 0.424 0.2701 0.2696 1.2712 1.2687
2014-15 Vernon Vipers BCHL 44 10 16 26 0.591 0.2300 0.2245 0.8617 0.8411
2015-16 BCHL 55 11 19 30 0.545 0.2123 0.1959 0.7955 0.7339
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 36 8 5 13 0.361
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 39 3 4 7 0.179
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 39 1 1 2 0.051
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 30 2 1 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
-48.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2966
Defenseman overall
#617
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.