IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Voltin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — USHL 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.2360 0.2591 1.2014 1.3192
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 7 19 26 0.433 0.2556 0.2671 1.3014 1.3597
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 33 3 11 14 0.424 0.2502 0.2497 1.2740 1.2715
2014-15 Vernon Vipers BCHL 44 10 16 26 0.591 0.2277 0.2223 0.8599 0.8393
2015-16 — BCHL 55 11 19 30 0.545 0.2102 0.1939 0.7939 0.7324
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 36 8 5 13 0.361
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 39 3 4 7 0.179
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 39 1 1 2 0.051
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 30 2 1 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
-48.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5734
Defenseman overall
#972
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Soloway
Colby · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vadim Vasjonkin
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Couto
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.