IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Slaggert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-04 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 48 5 8 13 0.271 0.2100 0.2142 1.0079 1.0280
2022-23 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 4 8 12 0.194 0.1500 0.1451 0.7202 0.6966
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 37 3 5 8 0.216
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 38 4 6 10 0.263
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 32 3 4 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Notre Dame
+47.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44892
Forward overall
#2971
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.