IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Garzone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 2 5 7 0.269 0.0759 0.0759 0.1232 0.1232
2021-22 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 24 2 4 6 0.250 0.0705 0.0705 0.1144 0.1144
2022-23 Coquitlam Express BCHL 42 8 12 20 0.476 0.1774 0.1821 0.6939 0.7122
2023-24 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 18 29 47 0.870 0.3242 0.3179 1.2683 1.2436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 28 2 1 3 0.107
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC — 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · Princeton
-29.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25248
Forward overall
#1427
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.