← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sully Scholle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chaska USHS-MN 28 11 11 22 0.786 0.2115 0.2115 0.1908 0.1908
2020-21 Chaska USHS-MN 19 20 18 38 2.000 0.5384 0.5384 0.4858 0.4858
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 18 4 1 5 0.278 0.1708 0.1701 0.8185 0.8153
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 59 26 28 54 0.915 0.3626 0.3582 0.9610 0.9493
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 35 7 11 18 0.514
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 38 3 13 16 0.421
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 7 4 11 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Maine
+37.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17172
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.